According to TheRegister.com, a massive power outage in late April 2025 plunged Spain, Portugal, and parts of southwestern France into darkness for up to 23 hours, affecting tens of millions of people and causing widespread transportation and communication failures. While this incident resulted from cascading technical failures rather than cyberattack, it highlighted the interconnected vulnerability of Europe’s energy grid, where disruptions can spread across borders within minutes. Ukraine is set to become the first country to demo the SOARCA tool, an open source security platform developed by TNO and Delft University that automates responses to both cyber and physical attacks on power infrastructure. The European Commission is funding resilience projects like the eFort framework as grid operators face challenges with aging systems, including Windows XP, BeOS, and 30-year-old networking software still in operation. This comes amid growing concerns about the fragmented incident response capabilities across Europe’s power sector.
Sponsored content — provided for informational and promotional purposes.
The Legacy Infrastructure Crisis
Europe’s energy infrastructure represents a perfect storm of technological debt and systemic complexity. What makes these systems particularly vulnerable isn’t just their age, but the vendor lock-in that prevents meaningful security upgrades. Power plants operate what amounts to technological museums—systems running everything from Windows NT4 to proprietary industrial control software that vendors fiercely protect under the guise of operational reliability. The reality is that many substations rely on protocols like DNP3 that have no encryption, access controls, or authentication, creating situations where systems “will literally take any command that’s sent to them,” as one expert noted.
The problem extends beyond individual components to the fundamental architecture of these networks. Within a single gas turbine, you might find seven different systems controlling ten devices each, all with separate IP addresses. This creates an attack surface that’s both broad and deep, where compromising one component can provide lateral movement opportunities throughout the entire infrastructure. The recent incident report from the April outage demonstrates how cascading failures can overwhelm even robust systems when multiple points fail simultaneously.
The Cost of Security Paralysis
The energy sector’s reluctance to upgrade stems from more than just technological conservatism—it’s a calculated economic decision. As Ukraine’s grid operator candidly admitted, even in “peaceful times,” deploying new security systems requires capital investment, staffing, training, and ongoing maintenance that many operators simply can’t justify to shareholders. This creates a dangerous gap between what’s technically possible and what’s economically feasible for grid operators facing competing priorities.
The regulatory landscape is beginning to shift with initiatives like the Network Code on Cybersecurity (NCCS), but enforcement and standardization remain inconsistent across borders. What’s missing is a pan-European approach that establishes baseline security requirements while acknowledging the economic realities of implementation. Without smart legislation that balances security needs with operational costs, we’ll continue seeing the “head in the sand” approach that characterizes much of the industry’s current stance.
The Standardization Imperative
The development of open standards like the CACAO Playbooks represents a crucial step toward collective defense. Standardized, automated workflows can dramatically improve threat intelligence sharing and response coordination across borders and organizations. However, the success of these initiatives depends on widespread adoption and the willingness of traditionally secretive organizations to share vulnerability information.
The fundamental challenge lies in reconciling the different priorities of IT and OT environments. While IT focuses on confidentiality and integrity, operational technology prioritizes availability above all else. The SOARCA tool’s approach of creating interaction between Security Operations Centers and control rooms represents a promising middle ground, but requires cultural and procedural changes that many established organizations resist. As European Commission-funded projects like eFort demonstrate, the technical solutions exist—the bigger challenge is organizational transformation.
The Geopolitical Dimension
Ukraine’s experience provides both warning and inspiration. The country has been forced to build “redundancies within redundancies” in response to actual attacks, creating resilience through necessity rather than planning. Their upcoming demonstration of the SOARCA tool offers valuable lessons for Western nations that have the luxury of preparing rather than reacting to active threats.
The interconnected nature of Europe’s grid means that an attack on one nation’s infrastructure can quickly become a continent-wide crisis. This creates both vulnerability and opportunity—while attackers can exploit single points of failure, defenders can leverage shared intelligence and coordinated response. The question isn’t whether Europe will face serious cyber threats to its energy infrastructure, but whether the continent can develop the collective security posture needed to respond effectively when those threats materialize.
Awesome post! Really enjoyed reading it.