According to CNBC, OPEC Secretary-General Haitham Al Ghais declared a “big shift” in the global energy conversation during an exclusive interview at the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference. Speaking on Tuesday, Al Ghais noted that just three years ago, the dialogue was dominated by “energy transition” and calls to “get rid of fossil fuels.” He said the current tone has shifted to a “balanced approach” that includes fossil fuels, calling this new perspective “music to my ears.” His comments were echoed by multiple industry players at the UAE’s annual oil summit, where many championed the concept of “energy addition” to meet rising global demand, including from new sectors like artificial intelligence.
Sponsored content — provided for informational and promotional purposes.
The New Energy Narrative
So what’s really happening here? The language has officially changed from “transition” to “addition.” That’s a massive rhetorical victory for the fossil fuel industry. For years, they’ve been fighting an uphill battle against the “keep it in the ground” crowd. Now they’re successfully reframing the conversation around energy security and meeting growing demand. It’s a classic political maneuver—when you’re losing the debate on your opponent’s terms, change the terms entirely. And honestly, it’s working. The “energy addition” framing allows them to position fossil fuels as essential partners to renewables, rather than relics to be phased out.
Why This Matters Now
Here’s the thing—this shift isn’t happening in a vacuum. We’re seeing real-world pressures that make this narrative change convenient. Global energy demand is actually increasing, not decreasing. The AI boom alone is creating massive new electricity needs that existing renewable infrastructure can’t fully handle yet. Plus, let’s be honest—geopolitical instability has made energy security a top priority for governments worldwide. When Russia cut gas supplies to Europe, suddenly having reliable domestic fossil fuel production didn’t seem like such a bad idea. The industry is capitalizing on these very real concerns to secure their social license to operate for decades to come.
<h2 id="the-business-implications”>The Business Implications
From a pure business strategy perspective, this is brilliant positioning. The fossil fuel industry isn’t fighting the renewable transition anymore—they’re co-opting it. They’re positioning themselves as the reliable backbone that enables the addition of intermittent renewables. Think about it: they get to keep their existing infrastructure profitable while potentially getting government support for “transition” projects like carbon capture. It’s a win-win from their perspective. They’re not the villains blocking progress anymore—they’re the pragmatic realists ensuring the lights stay on. And with AI’s insatiable power demands becoming the next big thing, their argument for “energy addition” over “transition” is finding surprisingly receptive ears.
What to Watch Next
The big question is whether this narrative shift will translate into actual policy changes. Will governments that were aggressively pushing phase-out dates start walking them back? Will climate funding get redirected toward “bridge” technologies that extend fossil fuel use? And how will environmental groups respond to this rhetorical coup? One thing’s for sure—the energy debate just got a lot more complicated. The simple story of “renewables good, fossils bad” is officially over. We’re entering an era where every energy source will be arguing for its place at the table, and the fossil fuel industry just secured themselves a much bigger chair.
