According to Fortune, Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon is pushing back against widespread AI job replacement fears, arguing that while there will be disruption, the economy has proven “very nimble” throughout history. Solomon specifically questioned the impact of AI-linked layoffs, noting that only 11% of Goldman Sachs investment banking clients are actively cutting jobs because of AI right now. However, the same survey found 37% of clients are already using AI in their main business processes, with that number expected to jump to over half within a year and 74% within three years. Solomon acknowledged recent high-profile layoffs like Amazon’s 14,000 job cuts but pointed out that even Amazon’s CEO said these weren’t “really AI-driven, not right now at least.” The Goldman chief believes corporate AI implementation may mean fewer white-collar jobs but insists these positions will be picked up elsewhere in the economy.
Sponsored content — provided for informational and promotional purposes.
The Reality Check
Here’s the thing – Solomon’s perspective is refreshingly grounded amid all the AI panic. We’re seeing this weird disconnect where headlines scream about AI replacing everyone, but the actual data from one of Wall Street’s most connected firms tells a different story. Only 11% of their clients are cutting jobs specifically because of AI? That’s way lower than the doomsday scenarios we keep hearing about.
But look, the adoption numbers are still staggering. When nearly three-quarters of major companies plan to integrate AI within three years, something big is definitely happening. The question isn’t whether AI will change the workforce – it’s how quickly and what the transition will look like. Solomon’s basically saying we’ve been here before with other transformative technologies, and humanity has always figured it out.
The Amazon Paradox
Now, the Amazon situation is particularly interesting. They cut 14,000 jobs but their CEO immediately walks it back from being “AI-driven.” So what’s really happening here? It seems like companies are using AI as both explanation and excuse for broader restructuring. The truth is probably somewhere in between – they’re not firing people because AI directly replaced them today, but they’re definitely not rehiring because they see AI handling future growth.
And that’s the subtle shift Solomon might be missing. It’s not just about current job cuts – it’s about the jobs that never get created because companies realize they can do more with fewer people. That’s where the real economic transformation happens, and it’s much harder to measure.
The Bumpy Road Ahead
Solomon did acknowledge this won’t be painless. He called AI a “double-edged sword” and warned about “bumps along the way.” That’s corporate speak for “some people are going to get screwed during this transition.” The Goldman survey shows the adoption curve is accelerating dramatically, which means the disruption could happen faster than previous technological shifts.
So where does that leave workers? Basically, Solomon’s message is comforting but shouldn’t make anyone complacent. The economy might adapt overall, but that doesn’t mean your particular job is safe. The companies embracing AI fastest – 37% are already using it in production – are the ones that will likely thrive, while slower adopters might struggle. And workers in roles that can be easily automated? They’re probably in for a rough ride regardless of how “nimble” the broader economy proves to be.
