According to Fortune, business coach and former Wall Street investor Codie Sanchez has identified obsession as the defining trait of successful people, based on her interviews with nearly a dozen billionaires including Palantir cofounder Joe Lonsdale. Sanchez, who has nearly 2 million TikTok followers and built a $17 million net worth through her company Contrarian Thinking, claims every successful person she’s met shares this “uncomfortable secret.” She argues obsession enables individuals to outperform smarter, richer competitors through “relentless action” and that just 3-5 years of absolute dedication can produce remarkable results, while 10 years can create billionaires. This perspective fundamentally challenges conventional work-life balance assumptions in modern entrepreneurship.
Table of Contents
The Obsession Economy: Beyond Hustle Culture
What Sanchez describes isn’t merely entrepreneurship – it’s what I call the “obsession economy,” where intense focus becomes the ultimate competitive advantage in an increasingly distracted world. While hustle culture glorifies busyness, obsession represents something deeper: complete cognitive immersion in solving specific problems. The distinction matters because obsession drives innovation in ways that scattered effort cannot. When Apple’s Steve Jobs entered his infamous “founder mode,” he wasn’t just working hard – he was completely absorbed in product perfection, a level of engagement that’s increasingly rare in our multitasking era. This aligns with research showing that finance professionals and tech founders who achieve extraordinary success often display this single-minded focus.
The Hidden Costs of Obsessive Success
While Sanchez’s observations about billionaire behavior may be accurate, they overlook significant risks that most professionals can’t afford. Obsession often comes at tremendous personal cost – strained relationships, burnout, and health issues that rarely make success stories. The reality is that most people lack the financial safety nets that allow billionaires to recover from obsession-induced failures. Furthermore, what works in high-growth technology sectors might not translate to other industries or sustainable career paths. Many professionals find that moderate dedication over longer periods produces better lifetime results than intense obsession followed by complete burnout. The missing conversation here is about sustainable excellence rather than binary choices between balance and obsession.
Obsession in the Age of Digital Distraction
Sanchez’s perspective gains particular relevance in our current digital landscape, where platforms like TikTok and the podcast ecosystem she leverages actually make deep focus more valuable precisely because it’s become so rare. The ability to maintain obsession-level concentration represents a genuine edge when most professionals struggle with constant notifications and competing priorities. However, this also creates a dangerous paradox: the very platforms that enable knowledge sharing and business building also fragment attention in ways that make sustained obsession increasingly difficult. Professionals must therefore develop strategies to protect their focus rather than assuming obsession will naturally emerge.
Practical Implications for Ambitious Professionals
The most valuable takeaway isn’t that everyone should become obsessed, but rather that strategic obsession applied to carefully selected domains can produce disproportionate results. Rather than abandoning work-life balance entirely, successful professionals often cycle between periods of intense focus and recovery. The key insight from Sanchez’s observations is that world-class achievement requires periods of unbalanced dedication, but these needn’t define one’s entire career. Professionals should identify which 3-5 year periods in their careers might benefit from this approach rather than assuming constant obsession is necessary or desirable. This nuanced understanding allows for both extraordinary achievement and sustainable career development.
