According to Financial Times News, UK Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood has launched a consultation on new laws that would force food delivery groups and other gig economy companies to verify whether workers are legally permitted to work in the UK. The announcement comes alongside details of a year-long program of raids targeting illegal employment, with 11,000 raids conducted between October 2023 and September 2024 resulting in 8,000 arrests. The regulations specifically target people using their own accounts to seek work through gig economy apps and those working as substitutes for account holders, addressing evidence that people with right-to-work status often lend their accounts to those without proper documentation. The measures are part of the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill currently in the House of Lords, with companies facing penalties including up to five years’ imprisonment for executives, fines of £60,000 per illegal worker, or business closure. This regulatory shift represents a fundamental challenge to the gig economy’s operating model.
Table of Contents
The Fundamental Business Model Conflict
This regulatory intervention strikes at the heart of how gig economy platforms have structured their businesses globally. For years, companies like Deliveroo, Uber Eats, and Just Eat have maintained that their workers are independent contractors rather than employees, which has allowed them to avoid traditional employment obligations including right-to-work verification. The UK government’s move effectively forces these platforms to adopt employer-like responsibilities while maintaining their contractor-based business model. This creates a significant operational tension – platforms must now implement verification systems typically associated with traditional employment relationships while continuing to classify workers as self-employed. The practical implementation will require developing entirely new verification protocols that don’t fundamentally alter their classification of workers as independent contractors under UK law.
The Technical and Operational Hurdles
Implementing effective right-to-work checks in the food delivery sector presents substantial technical challenges that go beyond simple document verification. The industry’s reliance on rapid onboarding and flexible working arrangements conflicts with the thorough verification processes required for immigration compliance. Companies must develop systems that can authenticate identities remotely while preventing the account sharing and substitution practices that have become common. The government’s mention of a future digital ID system suggests this is part of a broader technological transformation, but current solutions will likely rely on manual document checks that could slow down the onboarding process significantly. This creates a competitive disadvantage for platforms that implement rigorous checks against those that might take a more lenient approach.
Navigating Legal Precedents and Worker Rights
The regulatory approach must contend with established legal precedents, particularly the UK Supreme Court’s 2017 ruling that services like Deliveroo must allow workers to offer substitutes. This creates a fundamental conflict – the government wants to prevent substitution to stop illegal working, while courts have protected substitution rights as evidence of genuine self-employment. Resolving this tension will require either legislative changes to override court decisions or creative technological solutions that allow for verified substitutions. The Home Secretary’s aggressive stance also raises questions about proportionality, given that many asylum seekers facing work restrictions are in legal limbo for extended periods due to processing backlogs rather than any wrongdoing.
Industry-Wide Consequences Beyond Food Delivery
While the immediate focus is on food delivery platforms, this regulatory shift will inevitably spread across the entire gig economy spectrum. Ride-sharing services, freelance platforms, and other on-demand services will face similar requirements once the framework is established. The United Kingdom’s approach could also influence regulatory developments in other jurisdictions facing similar challenges with gig economy worker verification. The coordinated approach with major platforms through the July summit suggests the government recognizes the need for industry cooperation, but the voluntary measures agreed to then have now been superseded by mandatory requirements. This transition from voluntary cooperation to compulsory regulation marks a significant escalation in government oversight of platform labor markets.
Practical Implementation and Enforcement Challenges
The success of this initiative hinges on several practical factors that remain uncertain. The consultation process will need to address how smaller platforms with limited resources can implement verification systems without being crushed by compliance costs. There’s also the risk that increased regulation could push illegal working further underground into less visible sectors, making enforcement even more challenging. The government’s plan to share addresses of asylum seeker hotels with companies represents an unusual level of data sharing that raises privacy concerns while creating operational dependencies. Most importantly, the threat of business closure for non-compliance represents a nuclear option that regulators may be reluctant to use against major employers, potentially undermining the deterrent effect.
The Emerging Regulatory Landscape
This development represents the latest in a global trend of increasing gig economy regulation, but marks one of the first instances where immigration enforcement has been directly integrated into platform operations. The coming months will reveal whether other countries follow the UK’s lead in making platforms directly responsible for immigration compliance. The consultation process will be crucial in determining whether the final regulations balance enforcement needs with practical business realities, or whether they create compliance burdens that fundamentally alter the gig economy’s value proposition. Either way, the era of platform companies operating without immigration verification responsibilities appears to be ending, marking a significant new chapter in the relationship between digital platforms and regulatory authorities.
